Genetically engineered food: not ready for prime time.
نویسنده
چکیده
991022.html 2. PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR). July 17, 2000. Available at: http://ori.dhhs.gov/TheRCRPolicy.htm 3. Code of Federal Regulations 50.102 4. Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and misconduct in research. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1995:13 5. Friedman PJ. Advice to individuals involved in misconduct accusations. Acad Med 1996;71:716 6. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Federal Register. 64(198; October 14, 1999): 1999:55723 7. Kevles DJ. The Baltimore case: a trial of politics, science, and character. New York: Norton, 1998 8. Mishkin B. Responding to scientific misconduct: due process and prevention. JAMA 1988;260:1932 9. Relman AS. Publishing biomedical research: roles and responsibilities. Hastings Cent Rep 1990;20(3):23 10. Sly RM. Ethical scientific writing and responsible medical practice. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;79:489 11. Farndon JR, Buchler M. Two articles for comparison. Br J Surg 1999;86:598 12. Farthing MJG. An editor’s response to fraudsters. BMJ 1998;316:1729 13. Rennie D. An American perspective on research integrity. BMJ 1998;316:1726 14. Gisvold SE. Plagiarism or forgetfulness? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:493 15. Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR. Phenomena of retraction. JAMA 1998;280:296 16. Huston P. Information for peer reviewers. Can Med Assoc J 1994;150:1211 17. King CR, McGuire DB, Longman AJ, Carroll-Johnson RM. Peer review, authorship, ethics, and conflict of interest. Image J Nurs Sch 1997;29:163 18. Lock S. Does editorial peer review work? Ann Intern Med 1994;121:60 19. Stehbens WE. Basic philosophy and concepts underlying scientific peer review. Med Hypotheses 1999;52:31 20. Rennie D. Freedom and responsibility in medical publication. JAMA 1998;280: 300
منابع مشابه
A quantitative competitor PCR assay to detect genetically modified roundup-ready soybeans in commercially sold foods in Iran
Due to ever-increasing global diffusion and related socio-economic implications, the detectionof genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is very important. In this study, we design a plasmidcontaining two genes in mutated form as construct-specific (cp4 epsps) and event-specific(pd35S). It is applied for quantitative-competitor (QC) PCR as a simple and reliable method forthe detection of GM food....
متن کاملNot Ready for Prime Time: FDA’s Flawed Approach to Assessing the Safety of Food from Animal Clones
In December 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it had completed its “risk assessment” on food from animal clones. Our report, “Not Ready for Prime Time: FDA’s Flawed Approach to Assessing the Safety of Food from Animal Clones” analyzes FDA’s risk assessment and its conclusion (stated in the Agency’s press release) that FDA “finds that meat and milk from clones of adult cattl...
متن کاملA theoretical introduction to “Combinatory SYBR®Green qPCR Screening”, a matrix-based approach for the detection of materials derived from genetically modified plants
The detection of genetically modified (GM) materials in food and feed products is a complex multi-step analytical process invoking screening, identification, and often quantification of the genetically modified organisms (GMO) present in a sample. "Combinatory qPCR SYBRGreen screening" (CoSYPS) is a matrix-based approach for determining the presence of GM plant materials in products. The CoSYPS...
متن کاملInfluence of Matric Potential on Survival and Activity of Genetically Engineered Ralstonia eutropha H850Lr
Although the application of biodegradative genetically engineered micro organisms (GEMs) for bioremediation is very promising, the risks of their release should be assessed before their introduction into the environment. Lux-marked Ralstonia eutropha H850Lr (formerly Alcaligenes eutrophus H850Lr) was introduced into sterile and non-sterile soil microcosms at matric potentials ?2.11, ?30, ?750, ...
متن کاملThe private sector's role in public sector genetically engineered crop projects.
There is widespread interest within academia to work on public good genetically engineered (GE) projects to the benefit of the poor, especially to use GE-technology to contribute to food security. Not a single product from this work has reached the market. The major cause is GE-regulation, which prevents use of the technology for public good beyond proof-of-concept (Potrykus, I. (2010) Lessons ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Nutrition
دوره 17 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001